Posted December 24, 200718 yr comment_8866 http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071222/ap_on_...BxlQNPRb.kE1vAI I was thinking how horrible it was also that Cigna would not pay for this girl's transplant, but then later in the article it apparently is saying it only gives a 6 month survival rate and only 65% even get that apparently. Also she was in a vegetative state. So although it was wrong of Cigna, it still seems they are overdoing it when the family says the Insurance company "murdered" her. Unless I am misunderstanding something... she would have only "possibly" lived another half year and I guess not even be out of a coma. I understand how upset the family is, of course. But I still would say the cancer killed her, not Cigna. I used to have Cigna by the way.
Create an account or sign in to comment